Beyond “not this and not that either”
Sunday, November 26th, 2006“Interdisciplinary” is a Janus word.
Let’s reach beyond the relatively literal meaning, “between disciplines” (Is there perhaps some implied longing here? As in between meals? Between relationships? Middle Ages? I wonder how many people alive in 1100 C.E. would have thought of themselves as ‘between ages’?)
Like Janus, this word looks both backwards and forwards; it is present at a threshold.
“Interdisciplinary” looks back to a definition – condescendingly bestowed by the “disciplinists” – connoting “not this and not that either.” And it looks forward to an intersubjective (uh oh, the language is circling back on me now…) understanding that my identity depends on – no, IS – the tangle of all the relationships of which I am inseparable part.
My teaching can hardly be called “disciplinary.” In my music courses, I am not preparing students to be future music academics. In my creativity and innovation courses, or in the design and leadership courses I have taught in the chemical engineering department, my teaching does not lend itself to being described as being “within a discipline.” I am not (even?) an engineer.
But let’s transcend the hardly, the not‘s. It’s time for a new story (joined to and enjoying many other concurrent stories).
The blend, the hybrid. Silko’s half-breed Tayo. Risk, leaping the gap. Poetry.
