<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for thinkfetti</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkfetti.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com</link>
	<description>interconnections are the story</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on syncopation in music and management by rwparker</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/45#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>rwparker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/45#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts on syncopation. Usually, I tell my musicians to "accent the rest" --hit the silence just as hard as you hit the notes.

Regarding the first point: You can't tell that you're syncopating if you can't tell that you're "playing in the holes" between the beats. As when, for example, there just isn't any air between the notes (e.g, Bach's running 16ths). Or in other words, I can't syncopate until you shut up for a moment--because just a moment is all you need.

Another way of looking at your second point, the management problem: One of my mentors says, "How can you know that you've gotten what you wanted if you don't know what you want?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts on syncopation. Usually, I tell my musicians to &#8220;accent the rest&#8221; &#8211;hit the silence just as hard as you hit the notes.</p>
<p>Regarding the first point: You can&#8217;t tell that you&#8217;re syncopating if you can&#8217;t tell that you&#8217;re &#8220;playing in the holes&#8221; between the beats. As when, for example, there just isn&#8217;t any air between the notes (e.g, Bach&#8217;s running 16ths). Or in other words, I can&#8217;t syncopate until you shut up for a moment&#8211;because just a moment is all you need.</p>
<p>Another way of looking at your second point, the management problem: One of my mentors says, &#8220;How can you know that you&#8217;ve gotten what you wanted if you don&#8217;t know what you want?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on asking about beauty in science by D. Baldonado</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/43#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Baldonado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/43#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>*sigh* change the second "quantitative" to "qualitative". I need to remember to read my comments before I post them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh* change the second &#8220;quantitative&#8221; to &#8220;qualitative&#8221;. I need to remember to read my comments before I post them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on asking about beauty in science by D. Baldonado</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/43#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Baldonado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/43#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>What you're talking about is nothing new. I teach at the local middle school. I run into the same problem when I ask students to think, to explain, to describe. This is not something new, unfortunately. It is something ingrained into our education system from the very beginning up to the college level. In order to make good grades, they are required to have the "correct" answer. In order to get into the good schools with good scholarships, they have to have the "correct scores." In order to pass and get a degree, they have to have the "passing grades." None of this focuses on teaching them to think, to analyze, and to synthesize the information. The education that students receive today is lacking in originality and discussion. I blame it on trying to meet scores and expectation levels that are trying to quantify something that is truly quantitative. 

And for what it's worth... I'm only one teacher, but I AM trying to teach them to think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you&#8217;re talking about is nothing new. I teach at the local middle school. I run into the same problem when I ask students to think, to explain, to describe. This is not something new, unfortunately. It is something ingrained into our education system from the very beginning up to the college level. In order to make good grades, they are required to have the &#8220;correct&#8221; answer. In order to get into the good schools with good scholarships, they have to have the &#8220;correct scores.&#8221; In order to pass and get a degree, they have to have the &#8220;passing grades.&#8221; None of this focuses on teaching them to think, to analyze, and to synthesize the information. The education that students receive today is lacking in originality and discussion. I blame it on trying to meet scores and expectation levels that are trying to quantify something that is truly quantitative. </p>
<p>And for what it&#8217;s worth&#8230; I&#8217;m only one teacher, but I AM trying to teach them to think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on asking about beauty in science by Milton Friesen</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/43#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>Milton Friesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/43#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>Great bit to read about on a fall morning. I also find it troubling when I see evidence of people's inability to synthesize and integrate ideas and thoughts from a diverse sources. I don't blame, them, however, as we have been steeped in reduction-oriented approaches to learning. Even though we may feel that we are moving outside of that, the embedded ideas in our institutions, processes and invisible sensibilities still pays homage to this platform. And my arguement isn't with reduction - just the overemphasis it has received. Michel Serres, a French philosopher many North Americans don't know about, talks about the proper field of inquiry for philosophers being weather. Why? Because it requires us to synthesize significant disparities and uncertaines, necessitates us becoming good at being attentive to patterns. Keep at it. We need this kind of thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great bit to read about on a fall morning. I also find it troubling when I see evidence of people&#8217;s inability to synthesize and integrate ideas and thoughts from a diverse sources. I don&#8217;t blame, them, however, as we have been steeped in reduction-oriented approaches to learning. Even though we may feel that we are moving outside of that, the embedded ideas in our institutions, processes and invisible sensibilities still pays homage to this platform. And my arguement isn&#8217;t with reduction - just the overemphasis it has received. Michel Serres, a French philosopher many North Americans don&#8217;t know about, talks about the proper field of inquiry for philosophers being weather. Why? Because it requires us to synthesize significant disparities and uncertaines, necessitates us becoming good at being attentive to patterns. Keep at it. We need this kind of thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on asking about beauty in science by Brian Borchers</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/43#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Borchers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/43#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>That's about what I'd expect from a group of students at our institution- the problem is that we've chopped up the material that they're studying into such tiny little factoids that they think that college is about accumulating a large enough collection of facts, not about learning how to think.  My experience is that some of the students really appreciate any chance to think more deeply, while many others run scared when you ask them an open ended question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s about what I&#8217;d expect from a group of students at our institution- the problem is that we&#8217;ve chopped up the material that they&#8217;re studying into such tiny little factoids that they think that college is about accumulating a large enough collection of facts, not about learning how to think.  My experience is that some of the students really appreciate any chance to think more deeply, while many others run scared when you ask them an open ended question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On &#8220;Getting Things Done&#8221; by David Bonal</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/21#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bonal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/21#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Hey Dr. D!  
I am a true believer in GTD!  It has already changed my life in a big way, and I am three weeks into it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dr. D!<br />
I am a true believer in GTD!  It has already changed my life in a big way, and I am three weeks into it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on constellations in creative reading by Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/39#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 14:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/39#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Howdy!  I look forward to hearing about this problem-solving course.  I've got a lot of problems if you need case-studies! (kidding).  Ciao for now from Boston. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdy!  I look forward to hearing about this problem-solving course.  I&#8217;ve got a lot of problems if you need case-studies! (kidding).  Ciao for now from Boston. <img src='http://www.thinkfetti.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I, department chairman (part 3) by Rebcamuse</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/36#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebcamuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 01:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/36#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I think those protections are always necessary in leadership roles (although I note that you called it a service role).  The question is: how do you protect yourself?  You might not need these protections if you saw it as something OTHER than a service role.  I'm not advocating that in the least...but it is the burden of those who have a sense of ethical responsibility.  That's a good thing, I think. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think those protections are always necessary in leadership roles (although I note that you called it a service role).  The question is: how do you protect yourself?  You might not need these protections if you saw it as something OTHER than a service role.  I&#8217;m not advocating that in the least&#8230;but it is the burden of those who have a sense of ethical responsibility.  That&#8217;s a good thing, I think. <img src='http://www.thinkfetti.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on getting the electronic ducks lined up by doug</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/24#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/24#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the posting, Tim -- I'm heading out of town for the weekend, but I'll get in touch with you next week (schedule allowing!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the posting, Tim &#8212; I&#8217;m heading out of town for the weekend, but I&#8217;ll get in touch with you next week (schedule allowing!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on getting the electronic ducks lined up by Tim Mezel</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/24#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Mezel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/24#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Doug

Its great to see someone is teaching TRIZ in New Mexico.  I am a Level 3 TRIZ expert living and working here in Albuquerque.  Would love to see what you are going to teach.

Tim Mezel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug</p>
<p>Its great to see someone is teaching TRIZ in New Mexico.  I am a Level 3 TRIZ expert living and working here in Albuquerque.  Would love to see what you are going to teach.</p>
<p>Tim Mezel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on into and beyond logic by doug</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/35#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/35#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your suggestion.  Eric did say that he wouldn't recommend the Jaynes book as a textbook, more as a starting point for me in thinking about a course.  The book is helping me so far - I will see what interesting bits I can get out of it while also looking for other sources.  And I'll certainly follow up on your recommendation of the Williams' book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your suggestion.  Eric did say that he wouldn&#8217;t recommend the Jaynes book as a textbook, more as a starting point for me in thinking about a course.  The book is helping me so far - I will see what interesting bits I can get out of it while also looking for other sources.  And I&#8217;ll certainly follow up on your recommendation of the Williams&#8217; book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on into and beyond logic by Brian Borchers</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/35#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Borchers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/35#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Jayne's book was a work in progress that was completed and published after his death.  There's lots of interesting material in it, but it certainly wouldn't be appropriate for use as a textbook with undergraduate students.  It's at too high a level, the material is unpolished, and the focus on Jaynes' particular approach to an "objective Bayesianism" is way too unbalanced.

There are lots of more appropriate introductory textbooks on Bayesian statistics and decision analysis.  Some of these (like Jaynes) require a fair amount of mathematics background while others focus more on the philosophical issues.  I happen to like David Williams' book, "Weighing the Odds".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jayne&#8217;s book was a work in progress that was completed and published after his death.  There&#8217;s lots of interesting material in it, but it certainly wouldn&#8217;t be appropriate for use as a textbook with undergraduate students.  It&#8217;s at too high a level, the material is unpolished, and the focus on Jaynes&#8217; particular approach to an &#8220;objective Bayesianism&#8221; is way too unbalanced.</p>
<p>There are lots of more appropriate introductory textbooks on Bayesian statistics and decision analysis.  Some of these (like Jaynes) require a fair amount of mathematics background while others focus more on the philosophical issues.  I happen to like David Williams&#8217; book, &#8220;Weighing the Odds&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I, department chairman (part 2) by Rebcamuse</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/32#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebcamuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/32#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Great post!  I guess it is what we could call a "thoughtful no."  I'm sure I can find many times I've said "no" and haven't made the effort.  Of course when you are talking about enrollments of 500, there is a practicality issue.  But that of course brings up the issue of WHY we are talking about enrollments of 500 and WHY these students don't seem to have faculty advisors to whom they can go when they hear "no."  

I all too often default to "no" as a matter of convenience and your post has made me think that I need to work on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  I guess it is what we could call a &#8220;thoughtful no.&#8221;  I&#8217;m sure I can find many times I&#8217;ve said &#8220;no&#8221; and haven&#8217;t made the effort.  Of course when you are talking about enrollments of 500, there is a practicality issue.  But that of course brings up the issue of WHY we are talking about enrollments of 500 and WHY these students don&#8217;t seem to have faculty advisors to whom they can go when they hear &#8220;no.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I all too often default to &#8220;no&#8221; as a matter of convenience and your post has made me think that I need to work on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suffering under expertism by Rebcamuse</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/31#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebcamuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 04:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/31#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Ok, so when are we starting our own university? UofIW  (University of Intellectual Warmth).

I think there is a lot of societal pressure to be an "expert."  We depend on these "experts" for trial evidence, scientific data, documentaries, etc..

I don't think it always stems from hubris (or perhaps the hubris is a direct result of low self-esteem).  A certain close relative feels she needs to be an expert on everything, but it is clear when we've reached a topic outside her "expertise" because she changes the subject.  I can see that there are people who feel the need to convince the rest of the world that they are learned.  But those who really truly know, I think, don't have to broadcast it.  If one looks at the wisest teachers, there most often seems to be a humility that accompanies it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so when are we starting our own university? UofIW  (University of Intellectual Warmth).</p>
<p>I think there is a lot of societal pressure to be an &#8220;expert.&#8221;  We depend on these &#8220;experts&#8221; for trial evidence, scientific data, documentaries, etc..</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it always stems from hubris (or perhaps the hubris is a direct result of low self-esteem).  A certain close relative feels she needs to be an expert on everything, but it is clear when we&#8217;ve reached a topic outside her &#8220;expertise&#8221; because she changes the subject.  I can see that there are people who feel the need to convince the rest of the world that they are learned.  But those who really truly know, I think, don&#8217;t have to broadcast it.  If one looks at the wisest teachers, there most often seems to be a humility that accompanies it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The horror! The horror! (what I&#8217;m learning from GTD) by Rebcamuse</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/29#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebcamuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 04:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/29#comment-38</guid>
		<description>That's funny! I think I have one thing on my someday/maybe list. Maybe I've forgotten how to dream?  (My one item is: learn the cello).  I know I have more for that list but I don't allow myself to think about it very often.

But on the upside, my inbox is EMPTY and my mind is calm.

I'm not sure it is that surprising that the majority of your projects are work-related, I would say, however, that 144 is a lot.  Some questions you might ask are: are these projects outwardly or inwardly imposed?  I have to ask myself that A LOT.

I didn't do the tickler folder system (partially because we don't have room to allocate another file drawer for me) but I do use my calendar a lot more than I used to. I find the hardest part is actually forcing myself to write everything down.  Especially the small stuff that I was so used to keeping track of in my head.  But wow...when I write it down and know that it is safely stored in my PDA, it really reduces the anxiety I wasn't even aware I had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny! I think I have one thing on my someday/maybe list. Maybe I&#8217;ve forgotten how to dream?  (My one item is: learn the cello).  I know I have more for that list but I don&#8217;t allow myself to think about it very often.</p>
<p>But on the upside, my inbox is EMPTY and my mind is calm.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure it is that surprising that the majority of your projects are work-related, I would say, however, that 144 is a lot.  Some questions you might ask are: are these projects outwardly or inwardly imposed?  I have to ask myself that A LOT.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t do the tickler folder system (partially because we don&#8217;t have room to allocate another file drawer for me) but I do use my calendar a lot more than I used to. I find the hardest part is actually forcing myself to write everything down.  Especially the small stuff that I was so used to keeping track of in my head.  But wow&#8230;when I write it down and know that it is safely stored in my PDA, it really reduces the anxiety I wasn&#8217;t even aware I had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The horror! The horror! (what I&#8217;m learning from GTD) by Matthew Cornell</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/29#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Cornell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/29#comment-37</guid>
		<description>144 is a lot for a GTD-based system. As you point out so well, just *having* that information puts you into a great position to start asking some good questions... Nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>144 is a lot for a GTD-based system. As you point out so well, just *having* that information puts you into a great position to start asking some good questions&#8230; Nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The horror! The horror! (what I&#8217;m learning from GTD) by Brian Borchers</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/29#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Borchers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/29#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I find myself in a similar situation, typically I've got a few things that simply must be done quickly because of impending deadlines, plus so many multi-step projects that I can't decide which one to focus on first.  I have a bad habbit of focusing on the quick or fun longer term projects, not prioritizing the longer term projects and then having a deadline sneak up on me.  Just keeping track of my todo list seems to take up a lot of time.  RSS feeds and email also seem to take up way to much of my time.  I guess I'm a candidate for GTD...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find myself in a similar situation, typically I&#8217;ve got a few things that simply must be done quickly because of impending deadlines, plus so many multi-step projects that I can&#8217;t decide which one to focus on first.  I have a bad habbit of focusing on the quick or fun longer term projects, not prioritizing the longer term projects and then having a deadline sneak up on me.  Just keeping track of my todo list seems to take up a lot of time.  RSS feeds and email also seem to take up way to much of my time.  I guess I&#8217;m a candidate for GTD&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On &#8220;Getting Things Done&#8221; by doug</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/21#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/21#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the world (!?) of thinkfetti, Kathleen...  Getting Things Done is Getting Interesting now for me, as I'm seeing just how much work I'm doing on generic, non-interesting "stuff" these days.  (I just added a new post about this a couple hours ago)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the world (!?) of thinkfetti, Kathleen&#8230;  Getting Things Done is Getting Interesting now for me, as I&#8217;m seeing just how much work I&#8217;m doing on generic, non-interesting &#8220;stuff&#8221; these days.  (I just added a new post about this a couple hours ago)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On &#8220;Getting Things Done&#8221; by Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/21#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/21#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Hey - we've been sending employees to a class based on this book, and Brian has started with this system too.  He really likes it.  I like your list of books that you posted - I also like that you have a blog too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey - we&#8217;ve been sending employees to a class based on this book, and Brian has started with this system too.  He really likes it.  I like your list of books that you posted - I also like that you have a blog too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on books is books by Rebcamuse</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/25#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebcamuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkfetti.com/archives/25#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I'll be interested in your thoughts on &lt;i&gt;The Piano Tuner&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be interested in your thoughts on <i>The Piano Tuner</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
